首页> 外文OA文献 >Worlds Apart: the making and remaking of geopolitical space in the US-Uzbekistan strategic partnership
【2h】

Worlds Apart: the making and remaking of geopolitical space in the US-Uzbekistan strategic partnership

机译:《天壤之别》:美乌战略伙伴关系中地缘政治空间的建立与重建

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article analyses the US-Uzbekistan strategic alliance in terms of the illusion of â\u80\u98partnershipâ\u80\u99 which sustained it, the contrasting discourses which constructed and deconstructed it, and the implications of them for the region and the study thereof. Official Uzbek accounts of geopolitics contrast with official American renditions of the Central Asian â\u80\u98otherâ\u80\u99 and their expectations about the pace, place and ethics of Uzbek reform. These contrasts were reconciled for a short period by the illusion of common interests which sustained the strategic partnership. I show how contending representations of the partnership came to a head immediately after the Andijon uprising, amid precipitous national and international developments. These contingencies shattered an unstable discursive compromise, crystalised US and Uzbek policy-makerâ\u80\u99s positions, and pitted the two states against one another. Whilst not pre-determined or inevitable, this split was always probable. Nevertheless, these contrasting representations have not disappeared and continue to effect the practice and study of international politics in the region. We must, I argue, understand geopolitical dynamics in the region not in terms of swings of a pendulum â\u80\u98betweenâ\u80\u99 East and West, but in terms of the qualitative differences of each powerâ\u80\u99s power in the region. In other words, it is the exclusion of the United States from a spatially-defined and discursively-constructed region of Central Asia which limits its place in the region. An analysis born out of critical geopolitics calls into question these apparently objective descriptions. Differences between the way the US, Russia and China relate to Uzbekistan are found not so much in their mobilisation of strategic and economic resources, but in terms of their powers of representation, their ability to perform the authority of the Karimov regime. The United States, I conclude, is qualitatively less powerful than Russia and China in Central Asia.
机译:本文从维持乌兹别克斯坦的“ U80伙伴关系”幻觉,构造和解构它的对比话语以及它们对该地区的意义及其研究等方面分析了美乌战略联盟。乌兹别克斯坦对地缘政治的官方说法与美国对中亚“乌兹别克斯坦”的官方解释以及对乌兹别克斯坦改革的步伐,地点和道德观念的期望形成鲜明对比。维持战略伙伴关系的共同利益错觉在短期内调和了这些对比。我展示了在安第戎起义之后,在急剧的国家和国际事态发展中,这种伙伴关系的竞争代表如何立即达到顶峰。这些意外事件粉碎了不稳定的话语折衷方案,巩固了美国和乌兹别克斯坦政策制定者的立场,并使两国相互对抗。尽管不是预先确定或不可避免的,但这种分裂总是可能的。然而,这些截然不同的表象并没有消失,并继续影响该地区国际政治的实践和研究。我认为,我们必须了解该地区的地缘政治动态,而不是根据东西方之间的“摆”的摆动来理解,而是要根据每个国家的权力在质上的差异来理解。区域。换句话说,是美国被排除在中亚的空间定义和话语构造区域之外,从而限制了其在该地区的地位。批判性地缘政治产生的分析质疑这些表面上客观的描述。美,俄,中与乌兹别克斯坦关系的方式差异不在于调动战略和经济资源,而在于代表权,行使卡里莫夫政权的能力。我得出结论,在中亚,美国在质量上没有俄罗斯和中国强大。

著录项

  • 作者

    Heathershaw, John;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号